Skip to content

Conversation

@cpsievert
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpsievert cpsievert commented Oct 3, 2023

Closes #73

Note that this PR is basically the same as rstudio/shiny#3908, which makes a similar change to isTruthy() (it's implementation is basically copied here in shinyvalidate::input_provided())

PS., @rich-iannone, let me know if you'd like to hand over maintainer-ship of {shinyvalidate} (either way, I can put together a submission for you)

@rich-iannone
Copy link
Member

Carson, thanks for taking this on! And I think it makes sense that the maintainership for this is passed over to somebody on the Shiny team. I'll forward the CRAN email for the resubmission request and we'll follow the necessary steps for changing maintainer on submission.

@cpsievert cpsievert marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2023 15:28
@cpsievert cpsievert requested a review from rich-iannone October 3, 2023 18:46
@cpsievert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cpsievert commented Oct 3, 2023

Sounds good, I'll start another PR for the submission. This PR is ready to merge, but I'll need your approval to merge.

Copy link
Member

@rich-iannone rich-iannone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@cpsievert cpsievert merged commit ddd83f3 into main Oct 3, 2023
@cpsievert cpsievert deleted the null-is-atomic branch October 3, 2023 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

is.atomic(NULL) results in test errors on R-devel

3 participants